Key Takeaways
- Buffer offers more flexibility with its modular pricing structure, while Later provides stronger Instagram-specific visual planning tools.
- Later excels at Instagram grid visualization and first comment scheduling, whereas Buffer supports more social platforms and offers simpler team collaboration features.
- Free plans differ significantly: Buffer allows 3 social channels across any platform, while Later permits 1 profile per platform up to a maximum of 8.
- Both tools support auto-publishing to Instagram business accounts, but Later offers more robust hashtag management and media organization tools.
- Your choice between Buffer and Later should be guided by your specific needs—visual planning priorities, team size, number of accounts, and budget constraints
f you’re looking for a comprehensive solution, check out RankBurn’s top traffic source for your business.
Which Instagram Scheduler Is Right For You? Buffer vs Later Head-to-Head
Choosing the right Instagram scheduling tool can make or break your social media workflow. As a social media manager juggling multiple accounts and platforms, I’ve spent countless hours testing Buffer and Later to determine which truly delivers on its promises. Both tools have evolved significantly in 2025, offering compelling features for streamlining your Instagram content calendar—but they serve different needs in important ways.
In this comprehensive comparison, I’ll walk you through exactly how Buffer and Later stack up against each other, from pricing structures to Instagram-specific capabilities. Buffer has built its reputation on simplicity and cross-platform support, while Later began as an Instagram-first solution and maintains that visual-centric approach today. The differences extend well beyond these basics, though, and understanding them is crucial for selecting the right tool for your specific workflow.
Whether you’re a solo creator managing your personal brand, a small business trying to maintain consistent posting, or an agency handling multiple client accounts, this comparison will help you make an informed decision without the marketing hype that typically clouds these comparisons.
Core Features: How Buffer and Later Stack Up
At their core, both Buffer and Later accomplish the fundamental task of scheduling and publishing Instagram content—but they approach this task through different lenses. Buffer functions more as a comprehensive social media management toolkit with a straightforward, utilitarian interface. Later, meanwhile, positions itself as a visual-first platform that emphasizes Instagram’s unique requirements and creative planning needs.
Free Plan Limitations
Free plans often serve as many users’ introduction to these tools, making their limitations particularly important to understand. Buffer’s free tier allows you to connect up to 3 social channels of any type (Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) and schedule up to 10 posts per profile. The interface remains clean and uncluttered, though you’ll miss advanced features like analytics and first comment scheduling. Later takes a different approach with its free plan, allowing one profile per platform (Instagram, TikTok, Pinterest, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn) for a maximum of 8 social profiles. You’re limited to 30 scheduled posts per profile, but gain access to the visual Instagram grid planner even at this level.
Supported Social Platforms Beyond Instagram
While we’re focusing on Instagram in this comparison, most marketers manage multiple platforms simultaneously. Buffer currently supports Instagram, Facebook (Pages and Groups), Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, TikTok, and Mastodon—offering consistent functionality across all of them. Each platform integration feels equally polished, with Buffer’s clean interface adapting appropriately to each network’s unique requirements.
Later has expanded beyond its Instagram-only origins to support Facebook Pages, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, and TikTok. However, its additional platform support still feels somewhat secondary to its Instagram focus. For instance, the visual planning tools that make Later shine for Instagram aren’t as developed for other platforms. This Instagram-first approach makes Later ideal for brands where Instagram dominates their social strategy, but potentially limiting for those seeking equal capabilities across all platforms.
The platform differences become most apparent when scheduling to multiple networks simultaneously. Buffer’s interface makes cross-posting simple with the ability to customize each version of your post before scheduling, whereas Later’s workflow is more oriented toward platform-specific posting. For those interested in exploring other platform comparisons, check out this Notion vs Trello article for team collaboration insights.
Instagram-Specific Features Comparison
When it comes to Instagram-specific capabilities, Later maintains a slight edge thanks to its specialized focus. Both tools support direct publishing to Instagram business and creator accounts, eliminating the need for push notifications that plagued early scheduling tools. Later excels with its robust hashtag suggestions, the ability to store hashtag groups, and first comment scheduling—allowing you to place hashtags in comments rather than cluttering your captions. Its visual planner also lets you preview exactly how posts will appear in your grid before publishing, a crucial feature for brands with carefully curated aesthetics.
Buffer offers comparable Instagram publishing features but takes a more streamlined approach. Its Instagram Stories scheduling now includes direct publishing rather than just reminders, matching Later’s functionality. Buffer also provides shop grid features for product-focused accounts, though without the same level of visual customization as Later. Where Buffer stands out is in its analytics for Instagram, offering clearer performance metrics and engagement data than Later’s more basic reporting.
|
Feature |
Buffer |
Later |
|---|---|---|
|
Direct Instagram Publishing |
Business & Creator accounts |
Business & Creator accounts |
|
First Comment Scheduling |
Paid plans only |
All plans (including free) |
|
Grid Preview |
Basic preview |
Advanced visual planner |
|
Hashtag Management |
Basic storage |
Advanced groups & suggestions |
|
Stories Scheduling |
Direct publishing |
Direct publishing |
|
Reels Scheduling |
Limited support |
Limited support |
Mobile App Availability and Functionality
Both Buffer and Later offer mobile apps for iOS and Android, though their functionality differs considerably. Buffer’s mobile app provides nearly all the capabilities of its desktop version, allowing you to create, edit, and schedule posts from anywhere with minimal limitations. The interface is responsive and intuitive, making it practical for on-the-go scheduling and content creation.
Later’s mobile app, while visually appealing, offers a somewhat reduced feature set compared to its desktop experience. The visual planning tools that define Later’s desktop experience don’t translate as seamlessly to mobile. However, the app excels at content collection and initial planning, with a convenient media library that makes it easy to save potential content for later scheduling when you return to desktop. This makes Later’s mobile app better suited for idea collection rather than complete workflow management, similar to how Notion and Trello are used for team collaboration.
Should you require Local Business or webservices, we are here to assist you.
Pricing Breakdown: What You Get For Your Money
Understanding the cost structure of both tools is essential for making a financially sound decision for your social media management needs. Buffer and Later have fundamentally different pricing philosophies that can significantly impact your budget depending on your specific requirements.
Pricing becomes particularly important as your social media presence grows, since costs can escalate quickly when adding team members or additional accounts. Let’s examine how these two platforms structure their pricing to help you determine which offers better value for your particular situation.
Buffer’s Pay-For-What-You-Need Model
Buffer has adopted a modular pricing approach that lets you pay only for the features you need. Their base Essentials plan starts at $6/month per channel (billed annually) and includes scheduling, analytics, and engagement tools. The real advantage comes in Buffer’s flexibility—you can add exactly the number of channels you need without jumping to an entirely new pricing tier. For more details, you can check out this Buffer vs Later comparison. For example, if you manage three Instagram accounts and one Facebook page, you’ll pay for exactly four channels rather than being forced into a higher tier that might include more channels than you need.
Buffer’s Team Pack add-on costs an additional $6/month per user and includes approval workflows and user permission controls. While this modular approach can be cost-effective for precise needs, it requires careful calculation—especially for agencies managing numerous accounts across multiple platforms. The analytics add-on is priced separately at $10/month per channel, which can add up quickly if you need detailed performance data across many accounts.
Later’s Tiered Pricing Structure
Later follows a more traditional tiered pricing structure based on both features and usage limits. Their Starter plan begins at $18/month (billed annually) and includes one social set (one profile per platform) and basic scheduling features. Moving up to their Growth plan at $40/month expands this to two social sets and adds analytics features. The most substantial jump comes with their Advanced plan at $80/month, which accommodates three social sets and unlocks advanced features like team collaboration.
What’s unique about Later’s approach is that each “social set” allows you to connect one profile from each supported platform—essentially providing cross-platform coverage within each set. This structure favors users who manage multiple platforms for the same brand rather than multiple accounts on the same platform. For instance, if you manage Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter for three different clients, Later’s pricing becomes less advantageous compared to Buffer’s per-channel model.
Hidden Costs and Limitations
Both platforms have potential hidden costs that aren’t immediately obvious. With Buffer, the separate pricing for analytics means comprehensive reporting can substantially increase your monthly expense. Additionally, Buffer’s scheduling limits (100-2,000 scheduled posts depending on your plan) may force upgrades for high-volume posting needs.
Later’s hidden costs appear in their restrictive limits on scheduled posts per social set—ranging from 30 posts on the free plan to 150 posts on their Growth plan. For content-heavy strategies, these limits can be unexpectedly constraining. Later also charges a premium for additional social sets beyond what’s included in your plan, with prices ranging from $5-15 per additional set depending on your tier.
Price Comparison for a Typical Small Business
Small business with 2 Instagram accounts, 1 Facebook page, and 1 Twitter account:
Buffer: $24/month for 4 channels (Essentials plan)
Later: $40/month (Growth plan with 2 social sets)The same business adding analytics:
Buffer: $64/month ($24 for channels + $40 for analytics)
Later: $40/month (analytics included in Growth plan)
Content Planning and Visual Tools
The planning interface is where you’ll spend most of your time when using either tool, making its design and functionality crucial to your daily workflow efficiency. Buffer and Later take notably different approaches to content planning, with Later emphasizing visual layout and Buffer focusing on calendar-based scheduling.
For brands where Instagram aesthetics play a vital role in their strategy, these differences in planning tools can be the deciding factor between the two platforms. Let’s explore how each handles the content planning process.
Later’s Visual Instagram Grid Planner
Later’s standout feature is undoubtedly its visual Instagram grid planner, which shows exactly how your posts will appear together on your profile. This visual approach allows you to drag and drop content, rearrange posts, and preview the overall aesthetic of your feed before publishing. The grid planner makes it easy to maintain a cohesive visual identity and plan content themes that flow naturally from one post to the next. For brands where Instagram aesthetics are paramount—such as fashion, food, travel, or lifestyle accounts—this functionality alone can justify choosing Later.
Beyond the grid view, Later also offers a calendar view that displays content across all your connected platforms. However, even this calendar emphasizes visual thumbnails rather than just text descriptions, maintaining Later’s image-first approach throughout the platform. The ability to quickly visualize how different content pieces will work together makes Later particularly valuable for visually-oriented brands and content creators.
Buffer’s Calendar Interface
Buffer takes a more traditional calendar-based approach to content planning, focusing on efficient scheduling rather than visual arrangement. Its clean, minimalist calendar interface displays scheduled content in a timeline view that makes it easy to spot gaps in your posting schedule and maintain consistent cadence. While Buffer does provide image previews in its calendar, the emphasis remains on the timing and distribution of content rather than how posts will appear visually when published.
What Buffer lacks in visual planning it makes up for in scheduling efficiency. The queue-based posting system allows you to load up content and have it automatically distributed according to your predetermined schedule, which is particularly useful for maintaining consistent posting frequency. Buffer’s interface also excels at cross-platform posting, making it easier to adapt a single piece of content for multiple networks simultaneously.
Media Library Management
Later offers superior media management capabilities with a robust content library that serves as a repository for all your visual assets. You can upload, tag, and organize images and videos, making it easier to reuse content across campaigns or repurpose successful posts. The search and filtering options allow quick access to specific content types, and the ability to add notes to media items facilitates team collaboration during the planning process.
Buffer’s media library is considerably more basic, functioning primarily as temporary storage for the content you’re actively scheduling rather than a comprehensive asset management system. While you can upload and store media, the organizational tools are limited, and there’s no robust tagging or categorization system. For brands with extensive visual content libraries, this limitation may necessitate maintaining a separate digital asset management solution alongside Buffer.
Drag-and-Drop Capabilities
Later’s drag-and-drop functionality extends throughout its interface, allowing you to easily move content between dates, rearrange your visual grid, and organize your media library. This intuitive approach streamlines the planning process and makes visual adjustments quick and seamless. The ability to simply drag a post to a new date or position in your feed provides an intuitive content management experience that feels natural for visual planners.
Discover how to boost your personal brand by using AI automation tools in your business.
Instagram Publishing Options
The actual publishing process—how your carefully planned content makes its way to Instagram—differs significantly between Buffer and Later. These differences impact everything from workflow efficiency to the types of content you can schedule. While both platforms have significantly improved their Instagram publishing capabilities since Meta opened its API to third-party posting, notable differences remain.
Understanding these publishing options is crucial because they determine how seamless your posting process will be and whether you’ll need workarounds for certain content types. Let’s examine how Buffer and Later handle the various aspects of Instagram publishing.
Auto-Publishing Capabilities
Both Buffer and Later support true auto-publishing to Instagram for feed posts—but only for Business and Creator accounts. This direct publishing works seamlessly for standard image posts, allowing scheduled content to publish automatically at your designated times without requiring manual intervention. The process is reliable on both platforms, with posts typically publishing within minutes of their scheduled time. For those interested in exploring other social media tools, consider reading about Ubersuggest vs KWFinder for long-tail keyword discovery.
Where the platforms diverge is in handling content types beyond standard posts. Buffer has recently expanded its auto-publishing support to include carousel posts with multiple images, though video carousels still require manual publishing. Later offers similar carousel support but provides a more streamlined notification system for content that can’t be auto-published, making the manual publishing process slightly more efficient.
First Comment Scheduling
Later has a clear advantage when it comes to first comment scheduling, offering this feature even on its free plan. This functionality is particularly valuable for Instagram, allowing you to place hashtags in the first comment rather than cluttering your caption. Later’s implementation is straightforward—you simply enter hashtags or additional text in a dedicated field when creating your post, and it automatically publishes as a comment immediately after your post goes live.
Buffer only offers first comment scheduling on its paid plans, and the feature feels somewhat less integrated into the posting workflow compared to Later. However, Buffer does provide more flexibility in terms of the timing of your first comment, allowing you to schedule it to appear either immediately after posting or at a specific time interval. This can be useful for engagement strategies that involve asking questions or prompting interaction after users have had time to view your content.
Stories Publishing Differences
Instagram Stories scheduling has long been a challenge for third-party tools due to API limitations. Later offers direct publishing for Instagram Stories, but only for single-image stories from Business profiles. For more complex Stories with multiple frames or interactive elements, Later provides notification reminders that simplify the manual posting process by sending the prepared content to your phone at the scheduled time.
Buffer has similar capabilities for Stories publishing, with direct posting for single images and notification reminders for more complex content. Neither platform can currently schedule interactive Story elements like polls or questions, nor can they handle Story highlights management. For brands heavily reliant on Stories as part of their Instagram strategy, both tools offer workable solutions but still require some manual intervention for advanced Story features.
Both platforms have also begun offering limited support for Reels scheduling, though the functionality remains restricted compared to regular posts. Neither Buffer nor Later can currently schedule Reels with custom audio selections or interactive elements, limiting their usefulness for accounts that focus heavily on video content.
|
Instagram Feature |
Buffer Capability |
Later Capability |
|---|---|---|
|
Single Image Posts |
Full auto-publishing |
Full auto-publishing |
|
Carousel Posts |
Image carousels only |
Image carousels only |
|
Video Posts |
Full auto-publishing |
Full auto-publishing |
|
Stories (Single Image) |
Direct publishing |
Direct publishing |
|
Stories (Multiple Images) |
Notification workflow |
Notification workflow |
|
Reels |
Limited scheduling |
Limited scheduling |
|
First Comment |
Paid plans only |
All plans |
Support for Different Instagram Account Types
Instagram offers three account types—Personal, Creator, and Business—each with different capabilities and API access. Buffer supports scheduling to all three account types, but with significant limitations for Personal accounts. When using Buffer with a Personal Instagram account, you’ll receive a notification when it’s time to post rather than having content publish automatically. The notification workflow is streamlined, with Buffer sending the prepared content and caption to your phone, but it still requires manual intervention.
Later similarly supports all account types with the same limitations for Personal accounts. However, Later’s notification system for Personal accounts feels more refined, with clearer instructions and a more seamless handoff to the Instagram app. For users who can’t or prefer not to switch to Business or Creator accounts, Later’s implementation provides a slightly better experience, though the fundamental limitations remain with either tool.
Analytics and Reporting Tools
Making informed decisions about your Instagram strategy requires solid analytics data. Buffer and Later each provide metrics that help you evaluate performance, though their reporting capabilities differ substantially. These differences can significantly impact your ability to demonstrate ROI and refine your content strategy.
The depth and accessibility of analytics can be crucial for teams that need to report results to clients or stakeholders. Let’s examine how these platforms handle performance measurement and what insights you can expect to gain from each.
Post Performance Metrics
Buffer’s analytics provide a clean, straightforward view of post performance across all connected platforms. For Instagram specifically, Buffer tracks engagement rates, impressions, reach, saves, and shares for individual posts, allowing you to quickly identify your most successful content types. The dashboard presents this data in an accessible format with visual graphs that make it easy to spot trends and outliers. Buffer’s comparative analysis feature is particularly useful, enabling you to directly compare performance across different time periods to track improvement. If you’re interested in exploring similar analytics tools, you might find the comparison between Ubersuggest vs KWFinder for keyword discovery insightful.
Later’s analytics focus more heavily on Instagram-specific metrics with detailed breakdowns of engagement by post type, hashtag performance, and optimal posting times based on your audience’s activity. Their “Best Time to Post” feature analyzes when your specific audience is most active and recommends ideal posting windows for maximum engagement. While Later provides solid post-level metrics, its strength lies in identifying patterns across your content rather than diving deep into individual post analytics.
Both platforms offer exportable reports, though Buffer provides more customization options for creating branded reports that can be shared with clients or team members. Later’s reports are more visually oriented but offer fewer customization options, similar to how BrightEdge and Conductor differ in their SEO reporting capabilities.
Audience Insights Available
Understanding your Instagram audience demographics and behaviors is essential for creating targeted content strategies. Buffer provides basic audience insights including follower growth, gender distribution, age ranges, and location data. These metrics are presented in a straightforward manner that makes it easy to get a quick overview of who’s following your accounts.
Later offers more comprehensive audience analytics, particularly for Instagram. Beyond the basic demographic data, Later provides insights into when your followers are most active online, which content types generate the most follower growth, and detailed engagement patterns across different audience segments. This deeper analysis makes Later more valuable for brands looking to develop highly targeted content strategies based on audience behaviors.
Report Customization Options
Buffer excels in report customization, allowing you to select specific metrics, date ranges, and visualization styles when creating analytics reports. You can save report templates for regular reporting needs and export data in multiple formats for further analysis in external tools. The ability to create white-labeled reports with custom branding is particularly valuable for agencies that need to present professional analytics to clients.
Later offers less flexibility in report customization, with pre-defined report templates that can be adjusted only minimally. While you can export the data for further customization outside the platform, Later’s native reporting tools are more rigid. However, Later does provide visually appealing reports that effectively communicate key Instagram metrics without requiring extensive setup.
Team Collaboration Features
For teams managing social media together, collaboration tools can dramatically streamline workflows and approval processes. Both Buffer and Later offer team functionality, but with different approaches to permissions, content approval, and collaborative planning.
Whether you’re working with internal team members or external clients who need to review content before publication, these collaboration features will impact your day-to-day efficiency. Let’s explore how each platform handles team management.
Approval Workflows
Buffer provides a straightforward approval system where team members can draft posts that require review before scheduling. Approvers receive notifications when content is ready for review and can approve, reject, or request changes directly within the platform. The interface clearly indicates the status of each piece of content, making it easy to track what’s pending review versus what’s approved and scheduled. For team collaboration, you might also consider exploring Notion vs Trello as alternatives.
Later’s approval workflow is more visually integrated with its planning tools. Draft posts appear visually in the content calendar but are marked as pending approval, allowing reviewers to see how the content fits into the overall feed before approving. Later also includes more detailed feedback options, enabling approvers to leave specific comments or suggestions on individual elements of a post. This makes Later slightly more suitable for teams with complex approval requirements or those who need to maintain precise visual continuity. For a comprehensive look at how Later compares to other tools, check out this comparison of Buffer vs Later.
User Permissions and Access Levels
Buffer offers three distinct user roles: Admin (full access), Content Manager (can create and schedule content but not adjust account settings), and Social Media Manager (limited to specific accounts). This straightforward permission structure works well for most teams but may lack the granularity needed by larger organizations with complex hierarchy requirements.
Later provides more nuanced permission settings with custom access controls for specific functions. In addition to standard role-based permissions, Later allows administrators to enable or restrict access to particular features like analytics, publishing capabilities, or media library management on a per-user basis. This granular control makes Later more adaptable for organizations with specialized roles or strict access requirements, though it does require more setup time to configure properly.
Don’t Let Another Call Go Unanswered Convert Every Call Into Profit, All Day, Every Day
Unique Strengths and Limitations
Buffer’s Standout Capabilities
Buffer’s most significant advantage lies in its clean, intuitive interface that prioritizes efficiency. The platform excels at streamlining complex workflows, making it possible to schedule content across multiple platforms with minimal clicks. This efficiency focus extends to its queue system, which automatically distributes content according to preset schedules—allowing you to build a content pipeline quickly without manually selecting dates and times for each post. For those interested in exploring other automation tools, you might find our comparison of Jasper vs Copy AI for AI content generation insightful.
Another area where Buffer stands out is its consistent cross-platform experience. Unlike Later’s Instagram-first approach, Buffer provides equally robust functionality for all supported social networks, making it ideal for brands that maintain active presences across multiple platforms. The unified dashboard provides a consistent scheduling experience whether you’re posting to Instagram, LinkedIn, or Twitter.
Buffer’s modular pricing structure also deserves mention as a unique strength. The ability to pay only for the specific channels and features you need can make Buffer significantly more cost-effective than Later for certain use cases, particularly for brands managing multiple accounts on a single platform rather than multiple platforms for each brand.
Later’s Competitive Advantages
Later’s visual planning tools represent its most compelling advantage, particularly for brands where Instagram aesthetics are a priority. The ability to visualize and rearrange your Instagram grid before publishing helps maintain a cohesive visual brand identity that’s difficult to achieve with Buffer’s more timeline-focused approach. Combined with robust media management capabilities, these visual tools make Later the clear choice for visually-oriented brands.
Deal-Breaker Limitations for Each Tool
Buffer’s most significant limitation is its basic visual planning capability. For brands with meticulously curated Instagram aesthetics, the inability to preview and plan how posts will appear together in the grid view may be a deal-breaker. Similarly, Buffer’s relatively basic media management system makes it challenging to organize and reuse large libraries of visual assets effectively.
Later’s primary limitation is its pricing structure, which can become prohibitively expensive for managing multiple separate brand accounts. The platform is designed and priced for managing multiple platforms for the same brand rather than multiple brands on the same platform—making it less cost-effective for agencies or businesses managing numerous distinct accounts. Additionally, Later’s more complex interface requires a steeper learning curve than Buffer’s streamlined approach.
Best Choice Based On Your Needs
Selecting the right tool ultimately depends on your specific priorities, workflow requirements, and budget constraints. Rather than declaring an overall winner, let’s break down which tool works best for different user profiles and use cases.
The best platform for your needs will depend on factors like team size, number of accounts managed, visual planning requirements, and which specific features matter most to your workflow. Here’s a breakdown of recommendations based on different user scenarios.
Best For Solo Content Creators
Solo content creators and influencers will typically find Later more aligned with their needs, particularly if Instagram is their primary platform. Later’s free plan is more generous for single-account users, offering 30 scheduled posts compared to Buffer’s 10-post limit. The visual planning tools also provide significant value for creators who carefully curate their aesthetic, allowing them to maintain a cohesive grid that attracts followers. For those interested in exploring other tools, you might consider reading about Jasper vs Copy AI for AI content generation.
Later’s hashtag suggestions and storage features are also particularly valuable for individual creators who need to maintain consistent hashtag strategies without spending excessive time researching tags for each post. For creators who prioritize engagement over pure efficiency, Later’s first comment scheduling on the free plan provides an immediate advantage over Buffer.
Best For Small Businesses
Small businesses with modest social media presences that span multiple platforms will typically find Buffer more cost-effective and easier to manage. Buffer’s straightforward interface requires minimal training, making it ideal for small teams where social media responsibilities might be shared or handled by team members with limited specialized experience. For those interested in exploring other marketing platforms, consider comparing Facebook Ads vs LinkedIn Ads for B2B marketing performance.
Best For Agencies Managing Multiple Clients
Agencies managing multiple client accounts will almost always find Buffer’s pricing model more advantageous. The ability to pay per channel rather than per social set makes Buffer significantly more cost-effective when managing numerous distinct brand accounts. Buffer’s more structured approval workflows and cleaner reporting tools also align better with agency needs for client presentations and accountability.
Best For Visual-Heavy Brands
Brands where visual consistency and aesthetic planning are paramount—such as fashion, food, travel, or lifestyle businesses—will benefit most from Later’s specialized visual tools. The ability to plan and preview your Instagram grid layout, organize visual assets with tags, and maintain visual consistency across posts makes Later the superior choice despite potential price premiums.
For these brands, the investment in Later’s more robust visual planning capabilities typically pays off through more cohesive visual storytelling and stronger aesthetic branding. The time saved in planning visual content often justifies the higher cost for visually-driven businesses.
Frequently Asked Questions
After comparing these popular Instagram scheduling tools, several common questions arise about specific capabilities and limitations. Here are answers to the most frequently asked questions about Buffer and Later to help clarify any remaining uncertainties.
Can I schedule posts to Instagram personal accounts with Buffer and Later?
Yes, both Buffer and Later support scheduling to personal Instagram accounts, but with significant limitations. Neither platform can auto-publish directly to personal accounts due to Instagram API restrictions. Instead, both use a notification workflow that sends a reminder to your phone at the scheduled time, along with the prepared content and caption. For more insights on scheduling tools, you might be interested in comparing Ubersuggest vs KWFinder for keyword discovery.
The notification process is slightly more streamlined in Later, which sends the image and caption directly to your phone for easy posting. Buffer’s notification system is functional but requires a few more steps to complete the posting process. For full auto-publishing capabilities with either tool, you’ll need to convert your Instagram account to a Business or Creator profile.
Do Buffer and Later support Instagram Reels scheduling?
Both platforms offer limited support for Instagram Reels scheduling. You can upload and schedule video content intended for Reels, but neither platform supports Reels-specific features like adding trending sounds, effects, or interactive elements. The scheduled content will publish as a Reels post, but you’ll need to add these special features manually if desired.
Which platform offers better hashtag management for Instagram?
Later provides significantly better hashtag management tools compared to Buffer. Later includes a hashtag suggestion feature that recommends relevant tags based on your content and account history. It also allows you to save hashtag groups that can be quickly added to posts, and provides performance analytics that show which hashtags generate the most engagement. For a deeper dive into platform comparisons, check out our article on Notion vs Trello for team collaboration.
Buffer’s hashtag functionality is much more basic, allowing you to include hashtags in your captions or first comments but offering little in the way of management or analytics. There’s no built-in suggestion feature or ability to save groups of frequently used hashtags. For a detailed comparison, check out this Buffer vs Later comparison.
For accounts that rely heavily on hashtag strategy for discovery and growth, Later’s more robust hashtag tools represent a meaningful advantage that could impact overall account performance.
Hashtag Management Comparison
Later: Hashtag suggestions, saved hashtag groups, performance analytics, first comment scheduling on all plans
Buffer: Basic hashtag inclusion in captions, first comment scheduling on paid plans only, no suggestion or analytics features
Can I switch between Buffer and Later without losing my scheduled content?
Unfortunately, there’s no direct way to transfer scheduled content between Buffer and Later. If you decide to switch platforms, you’ll need to manually recreate your content calendar in the new tool. Neither platform offers an export function specifically designed for migrating scheduled posts to another service.
To minimize disruption when switching, consider planning the transition during a period of lower posting frequency or scheduling only a week ahead in your current tool while you build out your calendar in the new platform. Some users maintain subscriptions to both services during a transition period to ensure continuity in their posting schedule.
Leveraging AI for increased business leads, conversions, and sales
Do Buffer or Later offer direct posting to Instagram Stories?
Both Buffer and Later now support direct publishing to Instagram Stories, but only for single-image stories from Business or Creator accounts. For more complex Stories with multiple frames, interactive elements, or special effects, both platforms use a notification workflow similar to their handling of personal accounts.
Neither platform can currently schedule Stories with interactive elements like polls, questions, or sliders—these features must be added manually after publishing. For brands that rely heavily on interactive Story content, this limitation means that some manual posting will still be required regardless of which scheduling tool you choose.
Looking ahead, both companies continue to expand their Stories capabilities as Instagram’s API evolves, but for now, the functionality remains limited compared to standard feed post scheduling.
Buffer and Later both offer compelling solutions for Instagram scheduling, with different strengths that suit different workflows. Your choice ultimately depends on your specific priorities—whether you value visual planning, cross-platform consistency, pricing structure, or specific feature sets most highly.
When comparing Buffer and Later for Instagram scheduling, it’s essential to consider their features and pricing plans. Both platforms offer unique tools for managing social media posts, but they cater to slightly different audiences. Buffer is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for small businesses and individuals. On the other hand, Later offers a more visual approach, which can be beneficial for brands focusing heavily on Instagram aesthetics. If you’re also exploring other tools, you might want to check out this comparison of Jasper vs Copy AI for content generation to enhance your social media strategy.
f you’re looking for a comprehensive solution, check out RankBurn’s top traffic source for your business.